Eastern Lake Ontario Environmental Research Group 2000 (cont'd from eloerg.tripod.com/waupoos)

ELOERG ERT submission on Ostrander: Appendix V: Pushing the Envelope of the MoE SEV, Feb 2013
Slide to Extinction, Chris Humphrey, letter to Globe, October 31, 2018
Peter Galbraith, FRCP, obituary, October 2017
White Pines on Death Bed, Bruce Bell, Intelligencer, July 17,2018
Thucydides Trap, letter to Globe, May 2018
Great Lakes toxics down, SUNY Oswego/Clarkson U, April 2018
Machine subversion of democracy, letter to Globe, April 2018
Air Pollution overrides Ancestral Genes, Globe, March 2018
Olympian Cathal Kelly, letter to Globe, March 2018
Environmentalists seeking unemployment, letter to Globe, February 2018
Less is more on Bike Lanes, National Post, January 2018
Tramadol, 10 years on, Globe and Mail, November 2017
White Stripes: Belleville bicycle lanes, letters, November 2017
Occupational Cancers, CCO research results, Globe and Mail, October 2017
Big Pharmoney and Canadian Drug Use Guidelines, Globe and Mail, June 21, 2017, Kelly Grant
Oxycontin, 20 years on, letter to Globe, May 2017
Lake Ontario wind turbines to remain on hold? Feb 2017
Obituary, Raold Serebrin, September 2016
Sartorial slip or signal? letter to Globe editor, October 2016
Weapons of mass distraction, letter to Globe editor, Oct 2016
Point O turbines 99% Down the Drain, CCSAGE, July 7, 2016
Point O turbines Dead and Damned, PECFN, July 6, 2016
Rabid diplomat, letter to Globe, May, 2016
More on bats: rabid rocker? letter to Globe, January 2016
Lighthouses of eastern Lake Ontario, new book by Marc Seguin, March 2016
Continuing corporate windpower malfeasance: Windstream and Trillium Corp, Feb 2016
Amherst Island: the next fine mess, Feb 2016
Valerie Langer: Thirty years of effort pays off on the B.C. coast, Feb 1,2016
Trillium log, 6th annual ELO expedtion, September 2015
Trillium Wind Corp intent on Spoliation of eastern Lake Ontario and Main Duck Isle, June 2015
Turtles rule? Ontario Court of Appeal Decision: Turtlegate, April 2015
Obituaries, Mary Terrance (Luke) Hill, January 2015; Valerie Ingrid (Hill) Kaldes, July 2015
Ontario Court of Appeal turtle hearing, December 2014
Trillium Log, 5th annual ELO expedition, September 2014
Planetary public health manifesto, The Lancet, March 2014
Ostrander Bioblitz, butterfly inventory walk, August 10, 2014
Victory at Cape Vincent: British Petroleum withdraws turbine proposal, February 2014
Stay of execution granted by Ontario Court of Appeal, March 2014
Never say die: Will the Court of Appeal let the Ostrander Phoenix fly free again? March 2014
Divisional Court ruling in Ostrander: turtles belly up, Trojan horses win, February 2014
Lafarge 2020, pushing the air envelope again, Hazardous waste as cement kiln fuel proposal, Jan2014
Another fine mess in Port Hope: municipal waste incinerator proposal, January 2014
Ostrander: fiasco, or snafu? you decide, December 2013
Ostrander rises again, Noli illegitimi carborundum, December 2013
British Petroleum backing off Cape Vincent after a decade of aggression? December 2013
Turbines best Bald Eagles in U.S law, December 2013
SARStock 10 years after, letter to editor, August 2003
Trillium log September 2013: Surfin' USA: Hanging Ten in a Hughes 29
ERT Post mortem: Garth Manning lets it all hang out, August 2013
ERT post mortem: Cheryl Anderson lets it all hang out, August 2013
ERT Post Mortem: Ian Dubin lets it all hang out, August 2013
Great Lakes United turns thirty, goes down, RIP GLU, July 29, 2013
ERT decision, Ostrander turns turtle, goes down, July 3, 2013
PECFN Thankyou, and Appeal for funds, July 6, 2013
Minister of Env on Lake Ontario Off shore wind turbine status, June 2013
Lake Ontario water level control plan, June 2013
Play by Play, Part II, APPEC Ostrander ERT Appeal, June 2013
Ostrander ERT June 2013, Appendix VI, an indirect cause of human morbidity and mortality ?
ELOERG Presentation to Ostrander ERT, Part II, Human Health, May 2013
The Dirty E-Word, Terry Sprague, Picton Gazette, April 2013
Toxics in Great Lakes Plastic Pollution, April 2013
Bill Evans on Birds and Wind farms, April 2013
Mayday, Naval Marine Archive, April 2013
Experimental Lakes Area, Kenora, Closing by Federal Gov't, March 2013
Fishing Lease Phase out on Prince Edward Point, March 2013
Windstream makes $1/2 Billion NAFTA claim, March 2013
Play by Play, PECFN Ostrander ERT Appeal, March 2013
Offshore Wind turbine moratorium 2 years later, The Star, Feb 2013
ELOERG ERT submission on Ostrander: Appendix V: Pushing the Envelope of the MoE SEV, Feb 2013
Wente on Wind and Bald Eagle mugging, Globe and Mail, February 2, 2013
Sprague on Wind and Bald Eagle mugging, Picton Gazette, Jan 25, 2013
Cry Me a River over a Few Bats: Submission to Env Review Tribunal, ELOERG, January 2013
Lake Ontario's Troubled Waters: U of Michigan GLEAM, January 2013
Letter to Minister of Environment re: Ostrander, January 2013
No Balm in Gilead: Ostrander IWT's as Trojan Horses, January 2013
Ostrander Turbines: another Christmas gift by the MoE, Dec 2012
Occupational carcinogens: Ontario Blue Collar breast cancer study, November 2012
Fresh water fish Extinctions, Scientific American,November 2012
Great Lakes Toxics revisited, November 2012
Frack the What ? November 2012
$ 2 1/4 Billion Trillium Power lawsuit knockback Appeal, November 2012
Canada Centre for Inland Waters decimated, October 2012
Birds, Bats, Turbines, and the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, October 2012
Ecological public health, the 21st centurys big idea? British MedicalJournal Sept1,2012
Trillium log, Sept 2012
George Prevost, Saviour of the Canadas, 1812 - 1814. June 2012
The Victory at Picton: Bicentennial Conference on War of 1812-1814, Differing Perspectives, May 2012
Carleton Island and the 1812, letter to the Globe, October 2011
Queen's Fine Arts Department Succumbs, letter to Principal, December 2011
Mr. Kumar and the Super 30, November 2011
Letters, Articles and Projects from the Nineties
Alban Goddard Hill, web site manager

Enter subhead content here

Appendix V                                               ERT    Ostrander submission


“Unfortunately, although the MoE got off to a good start in 1970 in the regulation of Air Pollution, more recently their behavior in this arena has consistently been Regressive and Devious.”


“The Director’s Decision on Ostrander has been compromised by the documented pattern of conduct by the MoE in the regulation of air pollution in eastern Ontario in the past 15 years.”


Pushing the Envelope of the SEV


  1. Dirty Tricks: The Christmas Party Trick. 


On two occasions, in December 2006  (Bath, Lafarge), and in December 2012  (Ostrander, Gilead) , the MoE announced a Director’s Approval immediately before the  Christmas and New Years break, during which a two week period was allowed for  Appeal of the decision.


  1. In the “What Were They Thinking?” category:


In the Decision by the ERT (April 4, 2007) in the citizen’s Application for Leave to Appeal in Dawber v. Director MoE,  in the Bath, Lafarge application to burn tires:  the Tribunal noted that:  “under the Env Bill of Rights 1993 it appears that there is good reason to believe that no reasonable person,  having regard to relevant law and government policies, could have made the Decisions dated December 21, 2006  (to grant the two certificates of approval) to Lafarge Canada Inc.”


In the subsequent appeals of the ERT decision by Lafarge to the Ontario Divisional Court  and later the Ontario Court of Appeal, the Divisional Court noted that it would only make a finding against the Decision of the regulator if the actions of the regulator in making the Decision could be described as : egregious;  bungled; or betraying the public trust. The Divisional Court did in fact make such a finding (June 2008), although they did not  indicate which of the three epithets pertained.   The Court of Appeal agreed. (November 2008)


However it is clear that Directors of the MoE are not unreasonable people, otherwise they would not hold such a position. Therefore one must conclude that the Director, at least  in that particular case, was marching to a drummer other than the MoE Statement of Environmental Values. In that case presumably the different drummer was the interests of industry which the regulator had placed ahead of  their own SEV ethic.


  1. The  Fred Fairman Revelation:


In the course of research by citizens in the Bath case, the late Dr. Fred Fairman (retired professor of mathematics , Queen’s University) discovered that the MoE had for some time been allowing Lafarge to surreptitiously import hazardous waste from New York State to be burned in the Lafarge cement kiln, this without the appropriate public approvals process having been completed.


  1. The Myth of Continuous Monitoring:


A repeated practise by the MoE  when approving applications for facilities which release toxic industrial air emissions was to reassure  the public that there would be Continuous air emissions monitoring in place, with Strict, Stringent, Rigorous and Robust standards,  for the protection of the public health. These public pronouncements were repeatedly made by the MoE  in Trenton, 2000 (Norampac Steam Reformer), Bath 2005 (Lafarge cement kiln), and Clarington 2010 (Covanta municipal waste incinerator).


While it was technically true that air emissions monitoring in these cases was Continuous, this was a very misleading and deceptive statement which could easily be misinterpreted by the public. Although various less hazardous emissions would indeed be monitored continuously in these operations, when it came to more hazardous emissions such as Particulate Matter, Heavy Metals, and chlorinated organic poisons, monitoring would actually only be done as 3 X 3 hour stack tests on one day each year. This amounts to monitoring over 1/1000 of the year, which could better be described as Rare monitoring, or statistically speaking, no effective monitoring at all. It certainly was not continuous monitoring.


It was also revealing that the MoE persisted in this method of public reassurance in the Clarington case despite the revelations and fallout from the Lafarge case of five years before.


  1. Smoky Stacks and the Three Bears:     Mama Bear, Papa Bear and Baby Bear;

or:  Why use a superior method when you can use an inferior one? 


Source testing vs POI vs AAQC methods of industrial air discharge monitoring.


In the 1990’s and before, the standard of practise for air discharge monitoring from a polluting smokestack in Ontario was to do POI, Point of Impingement, testing, in which air samples were taken at the property limit of the facility  to measure contaminant fallout from the stack. This could be described as a “Simple but rather Ineffective” system. In his 2005/06 annual report ECO recommended, based on Env Canada  recs,  that the MoE move to Source testing, which uses direct measurement of chemical discharges by in-stack probes, and which could be described as a “Simple and Effective” method of monitoring. However the MoE instead chose to proceed with their initiative to abandon POI in favour of AAQC, the Ambient Air Quality Criteria method. This uses computer models to predict deposition of contaminants  in the region surrounding sources of pollution, and requires no chemical sampling at all. It could be described as a “Complex and Ineffective” method of regulation.


It is also noteworthy that despite the observations of the Tribunal in Dawber, and by the ECO, there remains as of today no absolute limits on chemical air discharges in Ontario (Guidelines A7 and A8), so the solution for air pollution in Ontario continues to be that of dilution.


6.  An Apple a Day keeps the Doctor away:


Failure to call public health physicians as witnesses to Air Pollution public  hearings and public meetings.


In the course of public hearings and public meetings regarding Air Pollution issues at Oakville (West Lincoln, OWMC hazardous waste treatment facility, Joint Board,1994), Cornwall (MMR pcb hazardous waste incinerator ERT 1999), Trenton (Norampac steam reformer, public meeting, 2000), Bath (ERT, 2006),  Clarington (Covanta incinerator, public meeting 2009), and apparently Ostrander (2013 ERT) no public health physicians have ever been called by the MoE to appear as Witnesses. Given the lack of expertise of the MoE in human health, this is  inappropriate.


Alban Goddard Hill    February 16, 2013


Enter supporting content here

Eastern Lake Ontario Environmental Research Group