|
Home |
CMAJ on PMRA, November 2023 |
EV as empty vessel in car sewers, Eric Reguly, Globe & Mail, May 20, 2023 |
Comic Piccini opera, Redux, Ontario auditor general Env Report, Globe & Mail, May 18, 2023 |
Venal or Venial? letter to Globe, May 16, 2023 |
"Cry me a river over a few bats", Redux, Globe & Mail, May 12,2023 |
Greenbelt "Scam": Barbarian Ford invasions, Globe & Mail, May 12, 2023 |
Barbarian Ford invasions case: City of Belleville Bell Creek dvlpt, Intelligencer, April 25, 2023 |
Road building projects in Wales, UK, cancelled as climate clangers, the Guardian, Feb 14, 2023 |
Unpublshed letter to Globe, 1996 opioids revisited, February 6, 2023 |
Cathal Kelly on climate charade, Globe & Mail, January 27, 2023 |
Ontario Bill 23, letter to the Premier, and Todd Smith MPP, Nov 24, 2022 |
Canola conundrum, letter to Globe & Mail, October 2022 |
3rd (Canadian) arm of U.S. Air Pollution Health Effects Study, the Guardian, Aug 12, 2022 |
Atomic awe and Boris blight, letter to Globe, July 11, 2022 |
Your !!*^%! car, Part II, Globe and Mail editorial, July 16, 2022 |
Your !!*^%! car, Part I, Globe and Mail, June 20, 2022 |
CAPE report on fossil fuels, Globe and Mail, June 9, 2022 |
Traffic Air Pollution Health Effects report, CAPE, April 2022 |
EU Bans Toxics, the Guardian, April 2022 |
Comic Piccini opera: Ontario Auditor General Environment Report, November 2021 |
......RIP Trillium...... November 16, 2021 |
Covid-19 Parlour Sessions 2020/2021, April 1, 2021 |
Mitch Podoluk, Obituary, Globe and Mail, September 2019 |
Notice to (Big Bay) Mariners, August 2019 |
Air Head, Globe and Mail, August 2019 |
Leon Redbone, RIP, June 2019 |
Ontario Endangered Species Act at risk, letter to Rod Phillips, April 2019 |
Slide to Extinction, Chris Humphrey, letter to Globe, October 31, 2018 |
Peter Galbraith, FRCP, obituary, October 2017 |
White Pines on Death Bed, Bruce Bell, Intelligencer, July 17,2018 |
Thucydides Trap, letter to Globe, May 2018 |
Great Lakes toxics down, SUNY Oswego/Clarkson U, April 2018 |
Machine subversion of democracy, letter to Globe, April 2018 |
Air Pollution overrides Ancestral Genes, Globe, March 2018 |
Olympian Cathal Kelly, letter to Globe, March 2018 |
Environmentalists seeking unemployment, letter to Globe, February 2018 |
Less is more on Bike Lanes, National Post, January 2018 |
Tramadol, 10 years on, Globe and Mail, November 2017 |
White Stripes: Belleville bicycle lanes, letters, November 2017 |
Occupational Cancers, CCO research results, Globe and Mail, October 2017 |
Big Pharmoney and Canadian Drug Use Guidelines, Globe and Mail, June 21, 2017, Kelly Grant |
Oxycontin, 20 years on, letter to Globe, May 2017 |
Lake Ontario wind turbines to remain on hold? Feb 2017 |
Obituary, Raold Serebrin, September 2016 |
Sartorial slip or signal? letter to Globe editor, October 2016 |
Weapons of mass distraction, letter to Globe editor, Oct 2016 |
Point O turbines 99% Down the Drain, CCSAGE, July 7, 2016 |
Point O turbines Dead and Damned, PECFN, July 6, 2016 |
Rabid diplomat, letter to Globe, May, 2016 |
More on bats: rabid rocker? letter to Globe, January 2016 |
Lighthouses of eastern Lake Ontario, new book by Marc Seguin, March 2016 |
Continuing corporate windpower malfeasance: Windstream and Trillium Corp, Feb 2016 |
Amherst Island: the next fine mess, Feb 2016 |
Valerie Langer: Thirty years of effort pays off on the B.C. coast, Feb 1,2016 |
Trillium log, 6th annual ELO expedtion, September 2015 |
Trillium Wind Corp intent on Spoliation of eastern Lake Ontario and Main Duck Isle, June 2015 |
Turtles rule? Ontario Court of Appeal Decision: Turtlegate, April 2015 |
Obituaries, Mary Terrance (Luke) Hill, January 2015; Valerie Ingrid (Hill) Kaldes, July 2015 |
Ontario Court of Appeal turtle hearing, December 2014 |
Trillium Log, 5th annual ELO expedition, September 2014 |
Planetary public health manifesto, The Lancet, March 2014 |
Ostrander Bioblitz, butterfly inventory walk, August 10, 2014 |
Victory at Cape Vincent: British Petroleum withdraws turbine proposal, February 2014 |
Stay of execution granted by Ontario Court of Appeal, March 2014 |
Never say die: Will the Court of Appeal let the Ostrander Phoenix fly free again? March 2014 |
Divisional Court ruling in Ostrander: turtles belly up, Trojan horses win, February 2014 |
Lafarge 2020, pushing the air envelope again, Hazardous waste as cement kiln fuel proposal, Jan2014 |
Another fine mess in Port Hope: municipal waste incinerator proposal, January 2014 |
Ostrander: fiasco, or snafu? you decide, December 2013 |
Ostrander rises again, Noli illegitimi carborundum, December 2013 |
British Petroleum backing off Cape Vincent after a decade of aggression? December 2013 |
Turbines best Bald Eagles in U.S law, December 2013 |
SARStock 10 years after, letter to Globe, August 2003 |
Trillium log September 2013: Surfin' USA: Hanging Ten in a Hughes 29 |
ERT Post mortem: Garth Manning lets it all hang out, August 2013 |
ERT post mortem: Cheryl Anderson lets it all hang out, August 2013 |
ERT Post Mortem: Ian Dubin lets it all hang out, August 2013 |
Great Lakes United turns thirty, goes down, RIP GLU, July 29, 2013 |
ERT decision, Ostrander turns turtle, goes down, July 3, 2013 |
PECFN Thankyou, and Appeal for funds, July 6, 2013 |
Minister of Env on Lake Ontario Off shore wind turbine status, June 2013 |
Lake Ontario water level control plan, June 2013 |
Play by Play, Part II, APPEC Ostrander ERT Appeal, June 2013 |
Ostrander ERT June 2013, Appendix VI, an indirect cause of human morbidity and mortality ? |
ELOERG Presentation to Ostrander ERT, Part II, Human Health, May 2013 |
The Dirty E-Word, Terry Sprague, Picton Gazette, April 2013 |
Toxics in Great Lakes Plastic Pollution, April 2013 |
Bill Evans on Birds and Wind farms, April 2013 |
Mayday, Naval Marine Archive, April 2013 |
Experimental Lakes Area, Kenora, Closing by Federal Gov't, March 2013 |
Fishing Lease Phase out on Prince Edward Point, March 2013 |
Windstream makes $1/2 Billion NAFTA claim, March 2013 |
Play by Play, PECFN Ostrander ERT Appeal, March 2013 |
Offshore Wind turbine moratorium 2 years later, The Star, Feb 2013 |
ELOERG ERT submission on Ostrander: Appendix V: Pushing the Envelope of the MoE SEV, Feb 2013 |
Wente on Wind and Bald Eagle mugging, Globe and Mail, February 2, 2013 |
Sprague on Wind and Bald Eagle mugging, Picton Gazette, Jan 25, 2013 |
Cry Me a River over a Few Bats: Submission to Env Review Tribunal, ELOERG, January 2013 |
Lake Ontario's Troubled Waters: U of Michigan GLEAM, January 2013 |
Letter to Minister of Environment re: Ostrander, January 2013 |
No Balm in Gilead: Ostrander IWT's as Trojan Horses, January 2013 |
Ostrander Turbines: another Christmas gift by the MoE, Dec 2012 |
Occupational carcinogens: Ontario Blue Collar breast cancer study, November 2012 |
Fresh water fish Extinctions, Scientific American,November 2012 |
Great Lakes Toxics revisited, November 2012 |
Frack the What ? November 2012 |
$ 2 1/4 Billion Trillium Power lawsuit knockback Appeal, November 2012 |
Canada Centre for Inland Waters decimated, October 2012 |
Birds, Bats, Turbines, and the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, October 2012 |
Ecological public health, the 21st centurys big idea? British MedicalJournal Sept1,2012 |
Trillium log, Sept 2012 |
George Prevost, Saviour of the Canadas, 1812 - 1814. June 2012 |
The Victory at Picton: Bicentennial Conference on War of 1812-1814, Differing Perspectives, May 2012 |
Carleton Island and the 1812, letter to the Globe, October 2011 |
Queen's Fine Arts Department Succumbs, letter to Principal, December 2011 |
Mr. Kumar and the Super 30, November 2011 |
Letters, Articles and Projects from the Nineties |
Alban Goddard Hill, web site manager |
|
|
|
Enter subhead content here
|
|
Port Hope residents worry about garbage incinerator Concerns about low-level radioactive
waste divided Port Hope for years. Now, a proposed incinerator is whipping up strong emotions. Aaron Harris photo for the Toronto Star Terry
Hickey, left, and Louise Ferrie-Blecher, right, at the site of a proposed incinerator in Port Hope, Ont. Both are against
the proposed $150-million project. By: Raveena Aulakh Environment, Published on Sat
Jan 04 2014 In Port Hope, a town nestled amid the Northumberland Hills just east of Toronto and peppered with historic
homes, antique stores and quirky restaurants, a bitter battle is brewing over garbage. “Why Port Hope, of all the places?” asks resident Louise Ferrie-Blecher. “We are just
beginning to clean up our radioactive waste… why should we be known as the garbage town now?” Ferrie-Blecher is a spokesperson for Port Hope Residents 4 Managing Waste Responsibly, one
of the groups that opposes a proposed $150-million incinerator project in a town already undergoing the biggest cleanup of
low-level radioactive waste in Canadian history — a legacy of decades of uranium refining. The roots of the garbage controversy were planted in 2009 when a company called ENTECH-REM
began working on a plan to build a “material recycling and gasification facility” — a.k.a. an incinerator
— on a 23-acre Port Hope site. Ferrie-Blecher and Terry
Hickey, chair of the Port Hope Ratepayers’ Association, say their opposition to the proposed plant is not NIMBYism.
“We started asking questions,” says Hickey, adding
they also sought expert advice. “ENTECH-REM has never had any convincing answers.” The incinerator plan has drawn the ire of hundreds of people in the town of 16,000, galvanizing them to
stick signs in their lawns, email their councillors and even seek expert advice. It has also led to fiery editorials in local
newspapers and outraged letters from residents. And some retired residents have donated their pensions to fight the project. “There are significant health concerns,” says Hickey. “We believe
that not enough work has been done to determine how bad it could be bad for Port Hope.” More about Port Hope at thestar.com: Port Hope residents, he says, have been provided with sketchy information. “There
is more marketing material than information,” he says. “For instance, what about nanoparticles? Or how they could
impact health?” Hickey also says ENTECH-REM has never built
or operated an incinerator or waste disposal plant in North America, a claim confirmed by the company. In an email, Lewis Staats, president of Renewable Energy Management, which holds the local
rights to technology developed by Australian company ENTECH RES, dismissed the health concerns. Nanoparticles — the scientific name for ultrafine particles — are everywhere,
he said. “They are present in emissions from aircraft, vehicles,
lawn mowers, wood-burning stoves and fireplaces, barbecue grills, printers in the workplace, power plants and many light and
heavy commercial and industrial operations,” said Staats. Staats
said the facility will use efficient low-temperature thermal conversion technology to convert solid waste to energy-rich synthetic
natural gas, a process known as gasification. “The gas will be utilized to produce electrical energy, the same way natural
gas is utilized to produce electrical energy.” But Stan
Blecher, a medical geneticist and professor emeritus at the University of Guelph (and Ferrie-Blecher’s father-in-law),
says all incinerators are bad, but the gasification kind “is probably worse.” That is because the gasification is done at a lower temperature than other kinds of incineration, and
can produce even higher levels of cancer-producing poisons such as dioxins, he says. “There are many references in the scientific literature to the fact that the lower temperature procedures
can be even more dangerous than higher temperature incineration,” says Blecher. To that, Staats responded out that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and many regulatory bodies
around the world, including Ontario, “consider that at present there is not enough information to regulate on nanoparticles.” He said the facility “will be required to comply with any new regulation
for nanoparticles or other emissions if any regulatory changes are made.” He also said that this low temperature thermal conversion by gasification technology developed by ENTECH has been
successfully used for more than 20 years in more than 150 installations in Australia, Southeast Asia and Poland. ENTECH-REM, whose head office is in Burlington, says construction will create
more than 250 jobs, while the facility will offer about 35 jobs when operational. Its application is currently under review by Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment. The Town of Port Hope did not respond to repeated requests for comment. Ferrie-Blecher
points out that REM noted in its own news releases on the proposed facility that it has “a steep hill to climb,”
because, while this technology is being used in places such as Poland, Malaysia and Singapore, “these countries may
not have as tough environmental standards as exist here in Ontario. “Our
town is starting to clean up,” says Ferrie-Blecher. “Eldorado messed it up for years ... and now we want to do
it to Port Hope again? With a new kind of technology? That is just moronic.” Eldorado is a reference to the decades’-old stigma still being fought by Port Hope. The picture-perfect lakeside town is riddled with low-level radioactive waste
deposited during 50 years of radium and uranium refining at the Cameco refinery, formerly the Crown corporation Eldorado Nuclear
Ltd., from the 1930s to the 1980s. It is spread all over town — around homes, in parks, office buildings. A cleanup will entail digging out more than 1.2 million cubic metres of soil,
will last over a decade and cost at least $260 million. The waste will be trucked to a storage mound south of Highway 401,
where it will be sealed up for centuries. Greg Burns, a councillor
who is publicly and vociferously against the incinerator proposal, says he cannot understand how, “if we are cleaning
up our town, we would want to bring in garbage.” ENTECH-REM,
he says, has acknowledged that it will process garbage waste from various Ontario municipalities. “Which means that
as trucks carry low-level radioactive waste from Port Hope, garbage trucks will roll into the town.” Port Hope will not be a tourist destination any more if that happens. “No one will ever want to come to Port Hope,” he says. “And
why should they? I won’t blame them.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter supporting content here
Eastern Lake Ontario Environmental Research Group
|
|
|
|