|
Home |
CMAJ on PMRA, November 2023 |
EV as empty vessel in car sewers, Eric Reguly, Globe & Mail, May 20, 2023 |
Comic Piccini opera, Redux, Ontario auditor general Env Report, Globe & Mail, May 18, 2023 |
Venal or Venial? letter to Globe, May 16, 2023 |
"Cry me a river over a few bats", Redux, Globe & Mail, May 12,2023 |
Greenbelt "Scam": Barbarian Ford invasions, Globe & Mail, May 12, 2023 |
Barbarian Ford invasions case: City of Belleville Bell Creek dvlpt, Intelligencer, April 25, 2023 |
Road building projects in Wales, UK, cancelled as climate clangers, the Guardian, Feb 14, 2023 |
Unpublshed letter to Globe, 1996 opioids revisited, February 6, 2023 |
Cathal Kelly on climate charade, Globe & Mail, January 27, 2023 |
Ontario Bill 23, letter to the Premier, and Todd Smith MPP, Nov 24, 2022 |
Canola conundrum, letter to Globe & Mail, October 2022 |
3rd (Canadian) arm of U.S. Air Pollution Health Effects Study, the Guardian, Aug 12, 2022 |
Atomic awe and Boris blight, letter to Globe, July 11, 2022 |
Your !!*^%! car, Part II, Globe and Mail editorial, July 16, 2022 |
Your !!*^%! car, Part I, Globe and Mail, June 20, 2022 |
CAPE report on fossil fuels, Globe and Mail, June 9, 2022 |
Traffic Air Pollution Health Effects report, CAPE, April 2022 |
EU Bans Toxics, the Guardian, April 2022 |
Comic Piccini opera: Ontario Auditor General Environment Report, November 2021 |
......RIP Trillium...... November 16, 2021 |
Covid-19 Parlour Sessions 2020/2021, April 1, 2021 |
Mitch Podoluk, Obituary, Globe and Mail, September 2019 |
Notice to (Big Bay) Mariners, August 2019 |
Air Head, Globe and Mail, August 2019 |
Leon Redbone, RIP, June 2019 |
Ontario Endangered Species Act at risk, letter to Rod Phillips, April 2019 |
Slide to Extinction, Chris Humphrey, letter to Globe, October 31, 2018 |
Peter Galbraith, FRCP, obituary, October 2017 |
White Pines on Death Bed, Bruce Bell, Intelligencer, July 17,2018 |
Thucydides Trap, letter to Globe, May 2018 |
Great Lakes toxics down, SUNY Oswego/Clarkson U, April 2018 |
Machine subversion of democracy, letter to Globe, April 2018 |
Air Pollution overrides Ancestral Genes, Globe, March 2018 |
Olympian Cathal Kelly, letter to Globe, March 2018 |
Environmentalists seeking unemployment, letter to Globe, February 2018 |
Less is more on Bike Lanes, National Post, January 2018 |
Tramadol, 10 years on, Globe and Mail, November 2017 |
White Stripes: Belleville bicycle lanes, letters, November 2017 |
Occupational Cancers, CCO research results, Globe and Mail, October 2017 |
Big Pharmoney and Canadian Drug Use Guidelines, Globe and Mail, June 21, 2017, Kelly Grant |
Oxycontin, 20 years on, letter to Globe, May 2017 |
Lake Ontario wind turbines to remain on hold? Feb 2017 |
Obituary, Raold Serebrin, September 2016 |
Sartorial slip or signal? letter to Globe editor, October 2016 |
Weapons of mass distraction, letter to Globe editor, Oct 2016 |
Point O turbines 99% Down the Drain, CCSAGE, July 7, 2016 |
Point O turbines Dead and Damned, PECFN, July 6, 2016 |
Rabid diplomat, letter to Globe, May, 2016 |
More on bats: rabid rocker? letter to Globe, January 2016 |
Lighthouses of eastern Lake Ontario, new book by Marc Seguin, March 2016 |
Continuing corporate windpower malfeasance: Windstream and Trillium Corp, Feb 2016 |
Amherst Island: the next fine mess, Feb 2016 |
Valerie Langer: Thirty years of effort pays off on the B.C. coast, Feb 1,2016 |
Trillium log, 6th annual ELO expedtion, September 2015 |
Trillium Wind Corp intent on Spoliation of eastern Lake Ontario and Main Duck Isle, June 2015 |
Turtles rule? Ontario Court of Appeal Decision: Turtlegate, April 2015 |
Obituaries, Mary Terrance (Luke) Hill, January 2015; Valerie Ingrid (Hill) Kaldes, July 2015 |
Ontario Court of Appeal turtle hearing, December 2014 |
Trillium Log, 5th annual ELO expedition, September 2014 |
Planetary public health manifesto, The Lancet, March 2014 |
Ostrander Bioblitz, butterfly inventory walk, August 10, 2014 |
Victory at Cape Vincent: British Petroleum withdraws turbine proposal, February 2014 |
Stay of execution granted by Ontario Court of Appeal, March 2014 |
Never say die: Will the Court of Appeal let the Ostrander Phoenix fly free again? March 2014 |
Divisional Court ruling in Ostrander: turtles belly up, Trojan horses win, February 2014 |
Lafarge 2020, pushing the air envelope again, Hazardous waste as cement kiln fuel proposal, Jan2014 |
Another fine mess in Port Hope: municipal waste incinerator proposal, January 2014 |
Ostrander: fiasco, or snafu? you decide, December 2013 |
Ostrander rises again, Noli illegitimi carborundum, December 2013 |
British Petroleum backing off Cape Vincent after a decade of aggression? December 2013 |
Turbines best Bald Eagles in U.S law, December 2013 |
SARStock 10 years after, letter to Globe, August 2003 |
Trillium log September 2013: Surfin' USA: Hanging Ten in a Hughes 29 |
ERT Post mortem: Garth Manning lets it all hang out, August 2013 |
ERT post mortem: Cheryl Anderson lets it all hang out, August 2013 |
ERT Post Mortem: Ian Dubin lets it all hang out, August 2013 |
Great Lakes United turns thirty, goes down, RIP GLU, July 29, 2013 |
ERT decision, Ostrander turns turtle, goes down, July 3, 2013 |
PECFN Thankyou, and Appeal for funds, July 6, 2013 |
Minister of Env on Lake Ontario Off shore wind turbine status, June 2013 |
Lake Ontario water level control plan, June 2013 |
Play by Play, Part II, APPEC Ostrander ERT Appeal, June 2013 |
Ostrander ERT June 2013, Appendix VI, an indirect cause of human morbidity and mortality ? |
ELOERG Presentation to Ostrander ERT, Part II, Human Health, May 2013 |
The Dirty E-Word, Terry Sprague, Picton Gazette, April 2013 |
Toxics in Great Lakes Plastic Pollution, April 2013 |
Bill Evans on Birds and Wind farms, April 2013 |
Mayday, Naval Marine Archive, April 2013 |
Experimental Lakes Area, Kenora, Closing by Federal Gov't, March 2013 |
Fishing Lease Phase out on Prince Edward Point, March 2013 |
Windstream makes $1/2 Billion NAFTA claim, March 2013 |
Play by Play, PECFN Ostrander ERT Appeal, March 2013 |
Offshore Wind turbine moratorium 2 years later, The Star, Feb 2013 |
ELOERG ERT submission on Ostrander: Appendix V: Pushing the Envelope of the MoE SEV, Feb 2013 |
Wente on Wind and Bald Eagle mugging, Globe and Mail, February 2, 2013 |
Sprague on Wind and Bald Eagle mugging, Picton Gazette, Jan 25, 2013 |
Cry Me a River over a Few Bats: Submission to Env Review Tribunal, ELOERG, January 2013 |
Lake Ontario's Troubled Waters: U of Michigan GLEAM, January 2013 |
Letter to Minister of Environment re: Ostrander, January 2013 |
No Balm in Gilead: Ostrander IWT's as Trojan Horses, January 2013 |
Ostrander Turbines: another Christmas gift by the MoE, Dec 2012 |
Occupational carcinogens: Ontario Blue Collar breast cancer study, November 2012 |
Fresh water fish Extinctions, Scientific American,November 2012 |
Great Lakes Toxics revisited, November 2012 |
Frack the What ? November 2012 |
$ 2 1/4 Billion Trillium Power lawsuit knockback Appeal, November 2012 |
Canada Centre for Inland Waters decimated, October 2012 |
Birds, Bats, Turbines, and the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, October 2012 |
Ecological public health, the 21st centurys big idea? British MedicalJournal Sept1,2012 |
Trillium log, Sept 2012 |
George Prevost, Saviour of the Canadas, 1812 - 1814. June 2012 |
The Victory at Picton: Bicentennial Conference on War of 1812-1814, Differing Perspectives, May 2012 |
Carleton Island and the 1812, letter to the Globe, October 2011 |
Queen's Fine Arts Department Succumbs, letter to Principal, December 2011 |
Mr. Kumar and the Super 30, November 2011 |
Letters, Articles and Projects from the Nineties |
Alban Goddard Hill, web site manager |
|
|
|
Enter subhead content here
|
|
EU unveils plan for ‘largest ever ban’ on dangerous chemicals
Up to 12,000 substances could fall within the scope of the new ‘restrictions roadmap’
Hand details showing microplastics over water Photograph: Maxshoto/Alamy
Arthur Neslen in Brussels
Mon 25 Apr 2022 12.08 BST
Last modified on Mon 25 Apr 2022 22.07 BST
Thousands of potentially harmful chemicals could soon be prohibited in Europe under new restrictions, which campaigners
have hailed as the strongest yet.
Earlier this year, scientists said chemical pollution had crossed a “planetary boundary” beyond which
lies the breakdown of global ecosystems.
The synthetic blight is thought to be pushing whale species to the brink of extinction and has been blamed for declining
human fertility rates, and 2 million deaths a year.
The EU’s “restrictions roadmap” published on Monday was conceived as a first step to transforming
this picture by using existing laws to outlaw toxic substances linked to cancers, hormonal disruption, reprotoxic disorders,
obesity, diabetes and other illnesses.
Advertisement
Industry groups say that up to 12,000 substances could ultimately fall within the scope of the new proposal, which would
constitute the world’s “largest ever ban of toxic chemicals”, according to the European Environmental
Bureau (EEB).
Tatiana Santos, the bureau’s chemicals policy manager, said: “EU chemical controls are usually achingly
slow but the EU is planning the boldest detox we have ever seen. Petrochemical industry lobbyists are shocked at what is now
on the table. It promises to improve the safety of almost all manufactured products and rapidly lower the chemical intensity
of our schools, homes and workplaces.”
The plan focuses on entire classes of chemical substances for the first time as a rule, including all flame retardants,
bisphenols, PVC plastics, toxic chemicals in single-use nappies and PFAS, which are also known as “forever chemicals”
because of the time they take to naturally degrade.
All of these will be put on a “rolling list” of substances to be considered for restriction by the
European Chemicals Agency. The list will be regularly reviewed and updated, before a significant revision to the EU’s
cornerstone Reach regulation for chemicals slated for 2027.
Chemicals identified in the new paper include substances in food contact materials, single-use nappies and PAHs (polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbon) in granules for children playgrounds.
But industry groups argue that the scheme’s focus on groups of chemicals could affect high street products such
as sun creams and perfumes, which may use a host of synthetic substances.
“A lot of different ingredients fall under the skin sensitiser group so a wide range of cosmetic products would
potentially be affected,” said John Chave, the director general of Cosmetics Europe, a trade body. “The
effect on consumers would be that there would potentially be less variety, less choice and less functional effectiveness for
cosmetic products with no gains for safety whatsoever because the ingredients were safe in the first place.”
Beyond cosmetics, affected products could include paints, cleaning products, adhesives, lubricants and pesticides.
Europe’s Reach system is already the world’s most extensive chemical register, and new bans could
hit more than a quarter of the industry’s annual turnover of around €500bn (£420bn) per year, according
to a study by the trade group Cefic.
“Some of the restrictions may have a significant impact on the industry and value chains,” said Heather
Kiggins, a Cefic spokeswoman.
The industry argues for a more narrowly targeted approach to restrictions, and for incentives and import controls to help
develop safer alternative products.
Nevertheless, the European Chemicals Agency favours dealing with chemicals in groups because chemical firms have previously
avoided bans on individual chemicals by tweaking their chemical composition to create sister substances that may also be dangerous,
but which then require lengthy legislative battles to regulate.
The industry tactic, known as “regrettable substitution”, has been criticised by environmental groups
for allowing the replacement of substances such as the endocrine-disrupting bisphenol A with other bisphenols.
Santos described it as “a cynical and irresponsible tactic by the chemical industry to replace the most harmful
banned chemicals with similarly harmful ones not yet on the regulatory radar. We’ve witnessed a decades-long pattern
of regrettable substitution to avoid regulation.”
More than 190m synthetic chemicals are registered globally and a new industrial chemical is created every 1.4 seconds
on average.
The UN says that it expects the industry’s global value of more than $5tn (£3.9tn) to double by 2030 and to
quadruple by 2060.
The EU’s environment commissioner, Virginijus Sinkevičius, said the new restrictions “aim
to reduce exposure of people and the environment to some of the most harmful chemicals, addressing a wide range of their uses
– industrial, professional, and in consumer products”.
Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday morning at 7am
The EU’s internal markets commissioner, Thierry Breton, said achieving a toxic-free environment would demand
transparency and visibility from the commission. “The restrictions roadmap provides such visibility, and allows
companies and other stakeholders to be better prepared for potential upcoming restrictions,” he said.
Millions of tonnes of chemical substances were used by industrial giants such as BASF, Bayer, Dow Chemicals and ExxonMobil
without completing safety checks between 2014 and 2019, according to research by German environmentalists.
Topics
Environment
Pollution
Plastics
European Union
Europe
news
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter supporting content here
Eastern Lake Ontario Environmental Research Group
|
|
|
|